PureSpectrum - Schedule A Demo
Our new GreenBook Directory site is live!
COVID-19 guidance, tips, analysis - access full coverage here

Results of the 2012 Cambiar Capital Funding Index

Over US $1.7 billion was invested in our industry in 2012, according to the second annual Cambiar Capital Funding Index. That's a massive 141% increase over 2011. It was not just the amount of money invested that more than doubled, but also the number of investments.



Editor’s Note: Many years ago I had contracted Simon Chadwick to broker a potential M&A deal for my old firm, Rockhopper Research. During the course of that engagement he shared with me one critical piece of advice when evaluating investment opportunities: follow the money. Well, Simon and the Cambiar team practice what they preach and for the second year in a row release the results of their Capital Funding Index so we can all follow the money, although many in the Mr space may not like where the path heads.

Over the last 2 months I’ve had an opportunity to do three in depth strategy workshops with my consulting clients. In those workshops I use a combination of GRIT data, the Cambiar Future of Research results, and examples from investment news to illustrate the seismic shifts occurring in the industry and to attempt to flesh out a vision for the future and where my clients can fit in that future. Using all of these data sources, I find that each independently validates the other and invariably leads me to the same conclusion that Simon reaches in this post: the future growth of the “insights sector” will be driven by non-traditional technologies centered around mobile,social, and analytics.

These are not the shiny new objects some would like to believe; investors are following the money clients are pouring into these approaches and we’re following the money the investors are putting in to get a piece of the pie. We can anticipate these broad trends continuing for some time.

Here is Simon’s masterful summary of what the CCFI tells us. It’s important information for us all.

By Simon Chadwick

Generally speaking, 2012 was not a stellar year for private equity and venture capital investment. In our neck of the woods, however, in the market research, information and analytics industry, it was not just a stellar year, it was a galactic one.

Over US $1.7 billion was invested in our industry in 2012, according to the second annual Cambiar Capital Funding Index. That represents a massive 141% increase over 2011. And it was not just the amount of money invested that more than doubled, but also the number of investments (130 in 2012 vs. 63 in 2011) and the number of investors involved (227 in 2012 vs. 100 in 2011). Clearly, this is one hot area where investment capital is concerned.

The CCFI reflects announced infusions of new capital into an industry that we define as market research, information and analytics. New capital means funds that are newly infused into the industry, and so excludes refinancing, acquisitions that are funded internally or other deals that do not require infusion of new capital.

What’s hot
But what exactly is it that is hot? In 2011, we found that traditional market research certainly was not hot, accounting for only US $15 million of the US $830 million invested in the sector by private equity and venture capital firms. In 2012, that figure fell to a paltry US $1.5 million. No, what is really hot is analytics. In 2011, analytics accounted for 50% of all new PE and VC capital flowing into the industry. In 2012, that figure rose to 72%.

Before moving to what “analytics” actually means in this context, it is worth noting that the bulk of the remaining investment went into platforms (technology designed to collect, analyse or visualise data) and market research. The latter is defined not so much by traditional survey companies as it is by things such as mobile applications, eye-tracking technologies, MROCs, proprietary panel building and DIY applications. This, then, is what attracts investors in the “market research” world, so much so that the actual quantum of investment in this area rose from US $138 million in 2011 to US $226 million in 2012.


But what really attracts them is anything that is (self-) labeled as “analytics.” Here, the quantum of investment rose from US $298 million in 2011 to an incredible US $1,047 million (or US $1.05 billion) in 2012.

But just what is analytics? In 2011, it was heavily defined by social media measurement. That fascination with social media continues today, with the amount invested in companies involved in social media measurement and analytics rising from US $198 million in 2011 to US $338 million in 2012. But it is the arrival out of virtually nowhere of “big data” that really catches the eye – from nothing in 2011 to US $358 million in 2012.


Another eye-catcher in this set of data is the three-fold increase in investment in anything to do with mobile – whether data collection or analytics. Investors pumped US $178 million into things mobile in 2012 compared with only US $53 million in 2011. This matches data from elsewhere (primarily Inside Research and Cambiar’s own Future of Research 2012 study) that suggests that spending on mobile market research and analytics really did take off in 2012 after many years of false dawns.

By region
In 2011, the vast majority (over 90%) of investment flowed into US-based companies, leading us to suggest that innovation in this space in America was perhaps more technology driven (and hence capital intensive), while that in Europe and elsewhere relied more heavily on intellectual property. While that still remains true in 2012, the US-centricity of capital investment has waned somewhat, suggesting that Europeans and Asians are also investing in more capital-intensive projects.


Nonetheless, the US still trumps all other regions as the destination of choice for investors, with 79% of all announced investment funds ending up within its shores. In part, this also reflects a fact of life, which is that while some new start-up companies do begin life in other countries (for example, in Africa or Asia), many migrate to the United States to continue their early-stage development for the explicit reason that they can more easily raise funding as a US-based enterprise.

When we looked at the stage of funding, we found that the vast majority of investments were taking place relatively early on in a company’s existence (Series A or B), but that there was nonetheless a significant amount of money also going into later stage (Series C or D) rounds. However, this is very much a function of the size of investments at each stage.


While Series D investments tended to be large (these are, after all, usually investments in companies that have been very successful), there were some extremely large individual investments in companies at earlier stages. These included US $70 million in Qualtrics, a US $50 million Series B investment in the location-based analytics company Quora and a US $50 million Series C investment in social analytics provider RadiumOne (not to mention the US $68 million Series C investment in the crowdsourcing co-creation platform, Quirky).

But the biggest kahuna of all was the big data analytics company, Mu Sigma, which received a whopping US $108 million in Series D financing – the biggest this sector has seen to date.

Who is doing all of this investing? Well, as noted earlier, no fewer than 227 investors put money into the sector in 2012, including 177 private equity and venture capital firms, 28 individuals (mainly previously successful technology entrepreneurs – and this is probably an undercount), 15 corporations (mainly technology companies and media firms) and seven angel funds (also probably an undercount). Just nine investors accounted for 20% of investment occasions, with New England Associates, Andreessen Horowitz, IA Ventures, Norwest Venture Partners and Sequoia Capital leading the way.

Where is this heading?
So, what are to make of this, and where does it suggest that we are going? We would not ever suggest that capital investment trends are indicative of real trends in the industry. After all, investors (to misquote Mark Earls) are herd animals as much as the rest of us. However, it does suggest that investors see great potential in analytics as a discipline, that big data has taken a hold of their imaginations, that social media as a source of data and measurement is still of enormous interest, and that mobile is finally gaining traction. Much of this reflects the sentiments and actions of clients detailed in our Future of Research 2012 study, suggesting that investors are in sync with what major corporations are seeing as vital to their futures. It also amplifies what we have being saying in these pages for some time – that the industry has to redefine itself if it is to be healthy in the future, bringing analytics, social media measurement and big data inside the tent, rather than allowing these to be seen as separate disciplines with which we have only a tenuous relationship.


This article first appeared in the January February 2013 issue of Research World published by ESOMAR

Please share...

3 responses to “Results of the 2012 Cambiar Capital Funding Index

  1. The industry’s fascination with buzz words like “analytics” and “big data” attests to the fast-moving nature of market research as we hastily move from one focus to the next. But I would still like to see the disposition of the industry be communicative-centered. If we’re hung up on analytics, we still need a way to communicate effectively those analyses. We have all the other pieces — the data & measurement (social media & text analytics) but we don’t have the delivery (communication). Analytics without effective insight communication renders any and all analyses essentially useless.


  2. Alleluia, Randi – could not have said it better ourselves! Nonetheless, this report focuses not so much on our fascination with these buzz words, but that of investors. Follow the money is the message here (for what it is worth).

  3. Thanks, Simon! No worries, the message here is clearly communicated. I think it’s the case that, like just about every other industry, market research is, at times, stunted by the demands of investors. I wonder about the outcome of following the market research philosophy of Steve Jobs and showing investors what they want (insight communication) rather than asking. Investors are a market, too.

Join the conversation