Categories
Brand Strategy
January 7, 2012
Corporate clients will turn to new faster alternatives that can provide them with 80% confidence in a fraction of the time.
0
I’ve just been reading the 120th prediction for 2012 – and blow me down, it caught my attention.
Kevin Lonnie of KL Communications (wonder how he came up with the company name 😉 said this in NGMR (http://linkd.in/zUk5E1)
“Corporate clients will turn to new faster alternatives that can provide them with 80% confidence in a fraction of the time.”
I’m in the middle of a Linked-In debate on whether we as researchers are neglecting our methodological rigor at our peril, and opening ourselves to attack from all angles – the good, the bad and the plain charlatan, all of whom have wares to sell.
The 80/ 20 mentality that Kevin touches on isn’t one that comes naturally to us Researchers. We have to go to the nth degree of detail if someone probes into the data – robust data is the bedrock of Insights.
Will this carry on? Here’s my take:
1. The folk who use our data – Marketing, Sales, General Managers – often work on an 80/20 basis. They need to make judgement calls, where not all the data is available. Complexity reduction is often a mantra – Behavioural Economics fans take note….;)
2. The pace of change is accelerating. By the time we have the “right” answer, the competition has moved, some distribution channels have shifted on their take on own labels, cost of goods has changed pricing perspectives…..And then we come with “the answer” – which took maybe 2 months.
3. Budgetary pressures will increase in a subdued economic environment. This will lead to Marketing exploring trade-offs more aggressively in the accuracy/ cost equation – as well as pushing for quicker stuff. DIY will continue.
4. The “how” will be increasingly elbowed aside by the “now what” in MR reporting. Without wishing to denigrate efforts to address engagement of response as an issue, Actionability for MR will become an increasing mandatory.
Budgets are invariably owned by Marketers and General Managers, ultimately. If we ignore their concerns – actionability, speed, cost, flexibility to name a few – we’re in danger of becoming methodologically obsessed, talking amongst ourselves, whilst the real game shifts elsewhere.
Curious, as ever, as to others’ views.
Disclaimer
The views, opinions, data, and methodologies expressed above are those of the contributor(s) and do not necessarily reflect or represent the official policies, positions, or beliefs of Greenbook.
Comments
Comments are moderated to ensure respect towards the author and to prevent spam or self-promotion. Your comment may be edited, rejected, or approved based on these criteria. By commenting, you accept these terms and take responsibility for your contributions.
More from Edward Appleton
Qualitative Research takes the front seat in this interview with Deborah Ancona.
Edward Appleton explores the difference between research and insights.
Edward Appleton shares what stood out at last week’s IIeX Europe.
We’re witnessing not just a renaissance of qualitative research, we’re seeing a transformation.
Top in Quantitative Research
Why are we still measuring brand loyalty? It isn’t something that naturally comes up with consumers, who rarely think about brand first, if at all. Ma...
Sign Up for
Updates
Get what matters, straight to your inbox.
Curated by top Insight Market experts.
67k+ subscribers