Categories
CEO Series
March 24, 2014
MESH is a relatively new but powerful player in the Research space. The company pioneered the use of mobile in touch-point analysis.
0
Editor’s Note: Edward Appleton is doing a series of posts focused on the client-side view of mobile research, with an emphasis on use cases and best practices learned so far. This is the third post in that series of posts that we’ll be publishing over the rest of the month. Part 1 & 2 can be found here.
By Edward Appleton
MESH is a relatively new but powerful player in the Research space. Founded in 2006 by Fiona Blades, the company pioneered the use of mobile in touch-point analysis.
Its central tool – Realtime Experience Tracking (RET) – was described by Harvard Business Review as “A New Tool radically improves Marketing Research” (09/ 2012). With its head offices originally in London, MESH has now expanded internationally, with offices in Singapore, New York and Sao Paolo. The company works for major multinationals including PepsiCo, Diageo and Unilever, LG Electronics and BSkyB – pretty impressive for a company that has existed only 7 years.
Fiona Blades, founder and Chief Experience Officer, shared her thoughts with me on the role of mobile in market research – or experience monitoring, in MESH parlance.
Why Mobile?
The origins of MESH and mobile tracking go back to the early 2000s. In her capacity as an advertising campaign planner for UK ad. agency Claydon Heeley she consistently noticed how traditional advertising tracking monitoring wasn’t picking up on the full range of brand touch-points.
“I knew from friends, and personal observation, that it wasn’t just TV advertising that was influencing a purchase decision of, say, a car. Seeing the neighbors’ car, going online, reading reviews…. there were many influences that we simply weren’t picking up” is how Fiona described it.
The overall picture of communication influence wasn’t complete – touch-points were getting lost. This was mainly due to two issues:
The critical commercial insight was that companies were missing potential opportunities.
This prompted Fiona to explore options to plug the touch-point gaps.
Piloting Mobile: Superior Accuracy and Speed of Insight Delivery
In 2001, Fiona conducted a one-off experiment in soft drinks communications research to validate what was initially a hunch. The use of mobile was central to the new approach: respondents were briefed to behave like researchers – taking their mobiles with them at all time, recording all their experiences on the mobile in a minimally intrusive manner.
The experiment suggested there was an idea there: when recording experiences on their mobiles, a higher number of touch-points with a greater diversity was registered than traditional touch-point methodology. The role of the “supporting media” – whether it be POS, outdoor, ambient to name a few – was up-weighted, the overall media picture more accurate.
And critically for decision making: the reporting was real-time, results were available in a matter of days, hours even, far quicker than traditional tracking reporting.
This initial success encouraged her to work on a simple tool designed to utilize mobile to capture experiences – Real-Time Experience Tracking (RET – see below ) and officially start Mesh Planning in 2006.
The Real Time Experience Tracking tool (RET)
Central to Mesh Planning is their “Real time Experience Tracking” tool. The technique is eminently simple and comprises of three distinct phases:
– Phase 1: Brand understanding: typically done on the laptop/desktop, this elicits data on brand awareness, knowledge, usage, perception.
– Phase 2: Mobile Capture – Diary: participants are asked to record every encounter they have with a category, wherever they are:
The options are limited, but include an “other”, and are pre-coded with a letter or number, so each respondent only gives a set of four digits. This is designed for speed and ease of response.
During this phase, respondents are also asked to maintain an online diary, typically on their laptop, where they are asked to describe experiences in more detail, upload photos. Probing questions specific to a client can be included here. Doing this on a smartphone would yield far less rich data, hence the use of traditional online.
Phase 3 – Data capture, again relating to brand knowledge/usage – and mirroring the questions posed in Phase 1. This allows a measure of pre-post shift.
Respondents are treated in a different way in this tool: they are briefed to become a researcher. This heightened involvement helps ensure richer responses, and is designed to pick up far more accurately on all and every touch-point.
Mobile Touch-point Tracking: Advantages
The features and core benefits of the MESH touch-point tool are as follows:
As media continues to fragment, this ability to fully cover experiential touch-points – as opposed to media-driven ones such as TV – is a key advantage of mobile.
Quant or Qual? Duration of Study?
Mesh studies are very largely quantitative with photos and comments included to give a qualitative perspective, a first-take on answering “why?”
A project typically lasts six weeks, with each respondent engaging for a week.
What Typical Types of Research Is Mobile Relevant For?
There are two main Research areas that MESH’s mobile experience tracking is used for:
i) Marketing and Campaign Evaluation:
Thanks to the speed of data-capture, and the improved accuracy of touch-point pick-up, the tool gives marketing decision makers a much greater ability to optimize their campaigns faster.
Touch-points that are under performing can be ditched, monies re-directed to areas that resonate strongly.
This results is clear and measurable improvements in ROI
Importantly: budget re-allocation is possible (at least theoretically) during a campaign. This saves immense amounts of money being wasted on the wrong media.
Case Study Gatorade Mexico – Fine-Tuning a Re-Positioning Exercise
Gatorade in Mexico had decided to re-position from a general sports drink to a specialist sports nutrition product.
Whilst the company possessed much research data on the re-positioning message, their decision to invest in experiential touch-points such as parks and gyms was less well grounded in empirical evidence.
They tasked MESH with executing a mobile-based study, asking the key question: was this channel-based investment working?
Mesh recruited 400 respondents, asked them to text about their experiences and interaction with Gatorade and its competitors over a one week period (the project duration was 6 weeks in total), and complete questions about brand image both pre and post the mobile diary phase.
The insights generated were as follows:
The marketing team took action immediately on these insights. The launch proved hugely successful, and became the blue-print for the Gatorade roll-out in Brazil.
ii) Shopper Analysis: Tracking the Path to Purchase/Choice
The RET tool allows brand owners to see exactly which touch-points are used more, which less over a period of time leading up to a purchase event.
Using mobile research to helps create a distinctly granular path-to-purchase that previously was not available in that level of detail. Brand owners can optimize their Customer Decision Journey model, and create distinct journey paths for different segments of shoppers.
The interplay between online and offline can be well understood. Behaviorism data (through cookie tracking) can be overlaid onto attitudinal data.
The following case study shows how mobile tracking can be used not just in brand advertising, but also for political campaigns.
Case Study: Tracking Floating Voters’ Political Opinions before the UK 2010 National Elections
MESH joined up with Cranfield School of Management to pioneer a new way of monitoring the shifts in voting intent amongst “floating voters” in the immediate run up to the 2010 UK elections.
The RET system was adopted. 900 British floating voters recorded their perceptions (over 18.000 experiences registered) of the main political parties Conservatives, Labour, Liberal Democrats (Lib Dem) over the period of final weeks in the run up to the British election (6 May 2010).
The key objectives were to identify:
Some key insights were as follows:
What is striking is the granularity of the insights delivered, and the clear attribution to a particular touch-point and message, allowing better targeting of marketing expenditure.
Outlook
MESH see mobile as continuing to grow in importance as a mode of data collection. What was originally considered a gimmick is now accepted as mainstream – with the publication in HBR a critical milestone in gaining credibility.
Curious, as ever, as to others’ views on mobile market research.
Disclaimer
The views, opinions, data, and methodologies expressed above are those of the contributor(s) and do not necessarily reflect or represent the official policies, positions, or beliefs of Greenbook.
Comments
Comments are moderated to ensure respect towards the author and to prevent spam or self-promotion. Your comment may be edited, rejected, or approved based on these criteria. By commenting, you accept these terms and take responsibility for your contributions.
More from Edward Appleton
Qualitative Research takes the front seat in this interview with Deborah Ancona.
Edward Appleton explores the difference between research and insights.
Edward Appleton shares what stood out at last week’s IIeX Europe.
We’re witnessing not just a renaissance of qualitative research, we’re seeing a transformation.
Top in Quantitative Research
Why are we still measuring brand loyalty? It isn’t something that naturally comes up with consumers, who rarely think about brand first, if at all. Ma...
Sign Up for
Updates
Get what matters, straight to your inbox.
Curated by top Insight Market experts.
67k+ subscribers